San Diego Convicted Murderer Appeals Death Penalty Sentence
San Diego man convicted of kidnapping and killing a 7 year old girl is appealing his death penalty sentence.
David Westerfield was convicted in 2002 for kidnapping and killing Danielle Van Dam, his 7 year-old neighbor. An appeal has been filed for Westerfield’s death penalty conviction by his attorneys. There is a 450 page legal brief that has been filed with the California Supreme Court. During Westerfield’s trial, media coverage was broadcast all over the world to let millions watch court proceedings live. Westerfield’s San Diego Criminal lawyers argue that the jury was “under siege” because the media was misleading viewers and giving them a “lynch mob mentality”.
A professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law, David Steinberg, reviewed the brief saying “this trial was conducted under a microscope”. Steinberg does not believe that argument is not a convincing one. The law professor also states that “trial publicity is not your best argument for reversing a conviction. Your best bet typically is that there’s some evidence introduced that should not have been”. It is being argued by Westerfield’s attorneys that search warrants were illegally obtained, and that judge William Mudd was showing unfair treatment by not sequestering the jury, not ruling out child pornography charges in a capital murder case, not granting motions for a mistrial and keeping some jurors against protests by the defense team.
There were 28 reasons listed for reversal in the appeal along with the argument that the California death penalty is unconstitutional. Steinberg does not think there is a good likelihood that Westerfield’s appeal will be successful. In Steinberg’s opinion he said he “would be very surprised if there is a reversal…either of his guilt or on the death penalty”.
10News Gets First Look At Westerfield Death Penalty Appeal, 10news.com, Feb. 11, 2012
Continue reading " San Diego Convicted Murderer Appeals Death Penalty Sentence " »
